Publicis Omnicom Group Merger Attempt Explained

The Publicis Omnicom Group merger attempt is a fascinating story that showcases the ever-changing landscape of the advertising industry.

In 2013, Publicis Groupe and Omnicom Group, two of the largest advertising holding companies in the world, attempted to merge in a massive deal worth $35.1 billion. This merger would have created the largest advertising company in the world, surpassing WPP.

The combined entity would have had a revenue of over $23 billion, making it a behemoth in the industry.

Related reading: Publicis & Hal Riney

The merger between Publicis and Omnicom was a massive deal that would have created the world's largest advertising company with $23 billion in revenue.

Publicis Groupe and Omnicom Group agreed to merge in an all-stock transaction to create Publicis Omnicom Group, with shareholders of both companies holding about 50% of the new entity.

The merger would have brought under one roof agencies including Omnicom's BBDO Worldwide and Publicis's Leo Burnett and Saatchi & Saatchi, extending their presence in every major market.

Broaden your view: Saatchi & Saatchi

The new holding company would have been based in the Netherlands, while the operating offices would have remained in Paris and New York. Publicis and Omnicom projected efficiencies of about $500 million from the combination.

The merger was expected to be completed by the first quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory and stockholder approvals.

However, the deal ultimately fell through due to difficulties in completing the transaction within a reasonable timeframe.

Publicis and Omnicom released each other from all termination fees, avoiding a $500 million penalty.

The collapse of the deal was a case of "eyes bigger than tummy" according to Martin Sorrell, CEO of WPP.

Take a look at this: Mckesson Corporation Fortune 500

The merger between Publicis and Omnicom was a bold and surprising move, proposed by Maurice Lévy, CEO of Publicis.

Publicis and Omnicom had revenues of $8.8 billion and $14.2 billion respectively in 2012, with a combined market capitalization of $14.6 billion and $16.7 billion.

The merged entity would become the biggest advertising group on the market, with around $5 billion more revenue than the current market leader, WPP.

See what others are reading: Omnicom Group

Publicis stated that $500 million in synergies would be generated from the merger.

Omnicom's profit margin was only 15%, compared to 18% achieved by Publicis, which gave Publicis a stronger bargaining position in the deal.

Lévy was able to leverage this and obtain half of the new company for Publicis shareholders in an "equal" merger.

If this caught your attention, see: Attempted Merger of Publicis and Omnicom

The Publicis Omnicom Group has a unique company structure that reflects its merged identity. The group would be listed on both the Euronext Paris and New York Stock Exchange.

The headquarters of the group would be registered in the Netherlands, a decision made for reasons of neutrality and not tax. This move would allow the group to maintain its global presence while minimizing tax liabilities.

Maurice Lévy, the 71-year-old former CEO of Publicis, would play a key role in the group's initial integration and development period. He would jointly head the group with Omnicom's John Wren for 30 months.

For more insights, see: Santa Barbara Tax Products Group

After the initial 30-month period, Lévy would become non-executive chairman, and Wren would take on the sole role of CEO. This transition would ensure a smooth handover and allow Wren to take the reins of the group.

The group's board would have equal representation from Publicis and Omnicom, with 16 directors including both Lévy and Wren.

The Publicis Omnicom Group's ownership structure is quite complex. Élisabeth Badinter, the daughter of Publicis' founder Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet and chairman of the supervisory board of Publicis, held a significant 9.13 percent stake in the company.

As the largest shareholder, she was expected to see her holding diluted by half due to the merger. This would have resulted in a substantial reduction in her ownership stake.

The merger was hailed as a "merger of equals" by the chief executives of Publicis and Omnicom, with shareholders from both companies set to hold around 50 percent of the new group's equity.

If this caught your attention, see: Boston Consulting Group's Advantage Matrix

In May 2014, the merger between Publicis and Omnicom was cancelled due to the magnitude of challenges remaining.

The cancellation was announced jointly by the two chief executives of Publicis and Omnicom, Maurice Levy and John Wren, in a statement.

The merger was expected to create the largest holding company in the world, but the challenges proved too great, including different corporate cultures and management philosophies.

The two companies had been losing billions in business pitches due to the uncertainty surrounding the merger, with $1.5 billion lost in the last month prior to the decision to cancel.

Omnicom's insistence on keeping all three top posts for its own executives was a major point of contention, with Maurice Levy stating that "it is not a merger of equals if you have a CEO, CFO and general counsel only from one side".

The deal was valued at $35 billion and would have made the merged Publicis-Omnicom Group the largest holding company in the world.

In the end, the two companies decided to proceed along their independent paths, releasing each other from all termination fees and avoiding a $500 million penalty.

The collapse of the deal was seen as a case of "eyes bigger than tummy" by Martin Sorrell, CEO of WPP.

Consider reading: MTN $5.2 Billion Fine