Which Statement about the Great Compromise Is Accurate?

The great compromise is a compromise between the free states and the slave states that was reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The compromise allowed for the continuation of slavery in the United States and the admission of new states into the Union on an equal basis. It also provided for the election of the president by a system of electoral colleges, rather than by Congress. The great compromise was an important step in the formation of the United States as a country.

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was an agreement made between the delegates from the states of Virginia and Maryland at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The delegates from these two states had been at odds over the issue of representation in the new government. The Virginia Plan had proposed that the new Congress be composed of two houses, with the number of representatives from each state being proportional to the state's population. However, the smaller states were opposed to this plan, as they would have had very little representation in the new government. The Great Compromise was the solution to this impasse. Under the terms of the agreement, the new Congress would be composed of a House of Representatives and a Senate. The House of Representatives would have representatives from the states proportional to the state's population, while the Senate would have two senators from each state. This compromise allowed for both the larger and smaller states to be represented in the new government.

In the summer of 1787, the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation. The delegates quickly decided that a new form of government was needed, and began drafting a constitution. However, they soon ran into trouble. The larger states wanted a national government with power based on population, while the smaller states wanted each state to have an equal say. The delegates could not agree, and the impasse was only broken when delegates from Virginia and Pennsylvania proposed the Great Compromise.

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was an agreement reached at the Constitutional Convention that saved the young United States from collapse. Under the agreement, larger states would get a House of Representatives where population was the basis for representation, while smaller states would get an equal say in the Senate. The Great Compromise was essential to the ratification of the Constitution and the eventual formation of a strong national government.

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention were faced with a difficult task in 1787. They were tasked with revising the Articles of Confederation, but quickly realized that a new form of government was needed. However, they soon ran into trouble. The larger states wanted a national government with power based on population, while the smaller states wanted each state to have an equal say. The delegates could not agree, and the impasse was only broken when delegates from Virginia and Pennsylvania proposed the Great Compromise.

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was an agreement reached at the Constitutional Convention that saved the young United States from collapse. Under the agreement, larger states would get a House of Representatives where population was the basis for representation, while smaller states would get an equal say in the Senate. The Great Compromise was essential to the ratification of the Constitution and the eventual formation of a strong national government.

The Great Compromise was the result of weeks of negotiation and debate at the Constitutional Convention. It was a complex agreement, but at its core, the Great Compromise settled the issue of representation in the new government. The larger states wanted a system where population was the basis for representation, while the smaller states wanted each state to have an equal say. The Great Compromise settled this disagreement by creating a two-house legislature, with representation based on population in the House of Representatives and equal representation for all states in the Senate. This compromise allowed the Constitution to be ratified and the

The great compromise was necessary because it addressed the key issue of how the American states would be represented in the new federal government. This was a key issue because the states were very different in terms of their populations, geography, and economies. The great compromise allowed for a more equitable representation of the states in the new federal government.

The great compromise was reached at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It was a key part of the Constitution, which was ratified by the states in 1788. The great compromise consisted of two key components: the establishment of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

The House of Representatives would be based on population, with each state getting a certain number of representatives based on its population. The Senate would have two senators for each state, regardless of population. This compromise between the states helped to ensure that the federal government would be more representative of the people as a whole.

The great compromise was necessary in order to get the Constitution ratified by the states. Without it, there would likely have been no Constitution, and no United States of America as we know it today.

The Constitution of the United States was ratified in 1788, after years of bitter debate over the issue of representation in the federal government. The delegates to the Constitutional Convention had originally agreed that the House of Representatives would be apportioned according to population, while the Senate would give each state an equal vote. However, as the Convention progressed, it became clear that this compromise was not acceptable to the smaller states, who feared that they would be outnumbered and outvoted in the House. The delegates from the small states threatened to walk out of the Convention unless their demands were met, and the resulting impasse was eventually resolved by the so-called "Great Compromise."

Under the terms of the Great Compromise, the House of Representatives would be apportioned according to population, while the Senate would give each state an equal vote. This compromise satisfied the demands of both the small and large states, and allowed the Constitution to be ratified. However, the issue of representation in the federal government was far from settled. Over the next century, the components of the Great Compromise would be hotly debated, and would eventually lead to the Civil War.

The Great Compromise was an important step in the formation of the United States government, but it was by no means the end of the debate over representation. The issue would continue to be a source of contention for years to come, and would eventually lead to the Civil War.

The great compromise of 1820 was a result of extensive deliberation and debate between representatives of southern and northern states over the issue of slavery. In the end, a compromise was reached that kept slavery legal in the southern states while banning it in the northern states. This compromise was essential in keeping the United States together as a single country and avoiding a Civil War.

The issue of slavery had been a divisive one since the founding of the United States. The northern states had always been opposed to slavery, while the southern states had defended it as a necessary part of their economy. The disagreement came to a head in 1819, when Missouri applied for statehood. The admission of Missouri as a slave state would upset the delicate balance between the number of slave and free states, and so both the House of Representatives and the Senate refused to vote on the matter.

In early 1820, a group of congressional leaders came up with a plan to admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, thus preserving the balance. This plan also included a provision that banned slavery north of the 36°30' parallel, with the exception of Missouri. This compromise was known as the Missouri Compromise.

Although the Missouri Compromise temporarily settled the issue of slavery, it did not do so permanently. The issue resurfaced in 1850 with the admission of California as a state. California's admission as a free state once again unbalanced the number of slave and free states, and so the Compromise of 1850 was reached. This compromise admitted California as a free state, ended the slave trade in Washington D.C., and created a more stringent fugitive slave law.

The compromises of 1820 and 1850 did much to quell the slavery debate in the United States, but it was not until the Civil War that the issue was finally settled. In 1865, the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed, which abolished slavery throughout the country.

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1788. The document outlined a federal system of government in which power was shared between a central government and the states. One of the key compromises that was reached during the Constitutional Convention was the Great Compromise, which resolved the issue of how representation would be determined in the House of Representatives. The Great Compromise resulted in a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives being based on population and the Senate having equal representation for each state. This compromise was essential in getting the Constitution ratified, as without it, the smaller states would have had no incentive to ratify the Constitution.

The Great Compromise had far-reaching consequences, as it established the precedent of representation in the House of Representatives being based on population. This meant that states with larger populations would have more power in the federal government than states with smaller populations. The Great Compromise also resulted in the creation of the Senate, which provided a check on the power of the House of Representatives. The Senate allowed for equal representation of each state, regardless of population, which meant that smaller states would have some representation in the federal government. This compromise was essential in ensuring that the Constitution was ratified, as without it, the smaller states would have had no incentive to ratify the document.

The Great Compromise had significant consequences for the distribution of power in the federal government. The House of Representatives, being based on population, meant that states with larger populations would have more power. This led to a system in which the larger states had more influence over the federal government. The Senate, on the other hand, provided a check on the power of the House of Representatives and ensured that each state had some representation in the federal government. This system of checks and balances was essential in preventing any one branch of the government from becoming too powerful.

The Great Compromise also had significant implications for the way that elections were conducted. In the House of Representatives, elections were conducted on a district basis, with each district electing one representative. This meant that candidates had to campaign in a specific district in order to be elected. In the Senate, however, elections were conducted on a statewide basis, with each state electing two senators. This system meant that candidates had to campaign statewide in order to be elected. The Great Compromise thus had a major impact on the way that elections were conducted in the United

The Missouri Compromise was a legislation passed in 1820 that allowed for the admission of Missouri into the United States as a slave state, while simultaneously banning slavery in any other state that was part of the Louisiana Purchase north of the 36° 30' parallel. The Compromise was seen as a way to maintain a balance between slave and free states, as well as to quell the growing sectionalism between the North and the South.

There are a few different ways to look at the Missouri Compromise – whether it was a good or bad thing. On one hand, the Compromise did help to temporarily alleviate some of the tensions between the North and the South. It also created a more even balance between slave and free states. However, on the other hand, the Compromise also helped to solidify the North and South as two distinct and separate regions, with very different cultures and economies. Additionally, the Compromise delayed the eventual showdown over slavery, which led to the Civil War.

So was the Missouri Compromise a good thing or a bad thing? There is no clear answer, but it certainly was a pivotal moment in American history.

In 1787, the United States Constitution was drafted at the Constitutional Convention. At the time, the country was comprised of thirteen states, each with its own government. The delegates to the convention were tasked with coming up with a document that would create a stronger central government while still preserving the states' rights. After much deliberation, they reached a compromise: the large states would share power equally with the small states in the House of Representatives, while the Senate would give equal representation to all states. This compromise was essential in getting the Constitution ratified, as it ensured that all states would be on board with the final document.

Without this compromise, it is doubtful that the Constitution would have been ratified. The small states were not eager to cede power to the large states, and would likely have refused to sign the Constitution if they had not been given equal representation in the Senate. The large states, on the other hand, would have been unwilling to give up their majority in the House of Representatives. This impasse could have led to the collapse of the Constitutional Convention, and the United States would have remained a loose collection of thirteen states, each with its own government.

The great compromise was essential in creating a stronger central government for the United States. Without it, the country would likely have remained fragmented and weak.

The Great Compromise of 1787 was an agreement made during the Constitutional Convention between delegates of states with large and small populations that the Constitution must represent each state equally. The agreement was pivotal in ratifying the Constitution. However, the Great Compromise has been criticized by many historians and political theorists.

Critics argue that the Great Compromise was a cornerstone of American democracy, but it was also a key factor in creating the wide gap between rich and poor in the United States. The deal allowed for an equal number of senators regardless of population, which gave more power to less populous states and allowed the wealthy to have more control over the government. The three-fifths compromise, which counted slaves as three-fifths of a person, also increased the power of southern states. This valuing of human property led to increased inequality and, eventually, the Civil War.

The Great Compromise has also been blamed for the rise of political parties and partisanship. The agreement created a bicameral legislature with two houses, the House of Representatives and the Senate. This system allowed for more debate and negotiation, but it also created gridlock and stagnation. The inability of the two houses to come to agreement on legislation has led to larger numbers of stalled bills and little momentous legislation being passed.

In recent years, some have argued that the Great Compromise is no longer relevant and that it should be abandoned in favor of a more proportional representation in the Senate. This would give more power to populous states and make the Senate more representative of the population as a whole. However, this would require a constitutional amendment, and it is unlikely that enough states would ratify such a change.

The Great Compromise was a landmark agreement that helped ratify the Constitution, but it has also been criticized for its negative impact on American democracy. While it is unlikely that the agreement will be undone, it is important to recognize its shortcomings and work to mitigate its negative effects.